<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Searching for &#8220;GM Bankruptcy&#8221; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notebooks.com/2009/06/01/searching-for-gm-bankruptcy-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notebooks.com/2009/06/01/searching-for-gm-bankruptcy-news/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=searching-for-gm-bankruptcy-news</link>
	<description>Notebooks and Laptops News, Deals and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:06:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: manojlds@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://notebooks.com/2009/06/01/searching-for-gm-bankruptcy-news/#comment-14157</link>
		<dc:creator>manojlds@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notebooks.com/?p=4585#comment-14157</guid>
		<description>Yeah when it comes to something just breaking, Bing is far from good. I tried Pixon12, the latest phone from Samsung that was announced not long back and all I got was two results in Bing. Google of course came up with lots of news and very relevant articles. Google is right up there, Bing has a lot of work to do to catch up. Bing is good in other aspects like image search. The snippet feature is good. But hey, end of the day, it is your index and how you build it that matters. Google does that ( and a lot more) really well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah when it comes to something just breaking, Bing is far from good. I tried Pixon12, the latest phone from Samsung that was announced not long back and all I got was two results in Bing. Google of course came up with lots of news and very relevant articles. Google is right up there, Bing has a lot of work to do to catch up. Bing is good in other aspects like image search. The snippet feature is good. But hey, end of the day, it is your index and how you build it that matters. Google does that ( and a lot more) really well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manojlds@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://notebooks.com/2009/06/01/searching-for-gm-bankruptcy-news/#comment-14158</link>
		<dc:creator>manojlds@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notebooks.com/?p=4585#comment-14158</guid>
		<description>Yeah when it comes to something just breaking, Bing is far from good. I tried Pixon12, the latest phone from Samsung that was announced not long back and all I got was two results in Bing. Google of course came up with lots of news and very relevant articles. Google is right up there, Bing has a lot of work to do to catch up. Bing is good in other aspects like image search. The snippet feature is good. But hey, end of the day, it is your index and how you build it that matters. Google does that ( and a lot more) really well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah when it comes to something just breaking, Bing is far from good. I tried Pixon12, the latest phone from Samsung that was announced not long back and all I got was two results in Bing. Google of course came up with lots of news and very relevant articles. Google is right up there, Bing has a lot of work to do to catch up. Bing is good in other aspects like image search. The snippet feature is good. But hey, end of the day, it is your index and how you build it that matters. Google does that ( and a lot more) really well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

