Comments on: MacBook Tablet Concept

By: toosh

toosh — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:59:09 +0000

the real one is here!!!!…only…it sucks…

just a giant iphone…

wtf?

By: toosh

toosh — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:59:09 +0000

the real one is here!!!!…only…it sucks…

just a giant iphone…

wtf?

By: ryan0mega

ryan0mega — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:58:47 +0000

thats what she said

By: steve

steve — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:31:47 +0000

Amazing! Apple Mac Book has already been very popular and now this technology is certainly going to rock the world.This is not only hi-tech but it is looking beautiful.

There are more features and articles on here:

http://www.touchuserguide.com

By: steve

steve — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:31:00 +0000

Amazing! Apple Mac Book has already been very popular and now this technology is certainly going to rock the world.This is not only hi-tech but it is looking beautiful.

There are more features and articles on here:

http://www.touchuserguide.com

By: steve

steve — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:31:00 +0000

Amazing! Apple Mac Book has already been very popular and now this technology is certainly going to rock the world.This is not only hi-tech but it is looking beautiful.

There are more features and articles on here:

http://www.touchuserguide.com

By: Geddy

Geddy — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:31:05 +0000

Ha ha.

This article was published in 2007. Here we are in 2009 and Apple has yet to produce a ‘touchbook’ or whatever.

btw: Off topic comment…

Every time a product fails to launch on time it is dubbed ‘vaporware’.

The term ‘vaporware’ applies primarily to Micros**t which announces hardware or software that directly competes with some existing hardware or software made by company ‘X’. (where X = Micros**t competitor)

The sheep dutifully wait for the announced product to come to market and thus delay purchase of X’s hardware or software in the hopes that Micros**t’s product is cheaper/better.

This irrevocably harms company X, Micros**t fails (or is months late) to produce the promised product and goes in for the kill, buying X outright or simply undercutting them and paying off its executives.

Almost all of Micros**t strategy over the past 20 years has been to copy and destroy, not create and innovate.

By: Geddy

Geddy — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:31:00 +0000

Ha ha.

This article was published in 2007. Here we are in 2009 and Apple has yet to produce a ‘touchbook’ or whatever.

btw: Off topic comment…

Every time a product fails to launch on time it is dubbed ‘vaporware’.

The sheep dutifully wait for the announced product to come to market and thus delay purchase of X’s hardware or software in the hopes that Micros**t’s product is cheaper/better.

Almost all of Micros**t strategy over the past 20 years has been to copy and destroy, not create and innovate.

By: Geddy

Geddy — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:31:00 +0000

Ha ha.

This article was published in 2007. Here we are in 2009 and Apple has yet to produce a ‘touchbook’ or whatever.

btw: Off topic comment…

Every time a product fails to launch on time it is dubbed ‘vaporware’.

The sheep dutifully wait for the announced product to come to market and thus delay purchase of X’s hardware or software in the hopes that Micros**t’s product is cheaper/better.

Almost all of Micros**t strategy over the past 20 years has been to copy and destroy, not create and innovate.

By: John

John — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:38:18 +0000

The best theory as to why this is a very likely possibility is because Apple just upped the new unibody 13″ Macbook and are now calling it a Macbook Pro.. So now the 13, 15, and 17 “MacBooks” are strictly known as “MacBook Pros”.. This means, that when the OLD MacBook 13 inch and the old black/white MacBooks sell out, there will no longer be a “MacBook” for purchase through Apple. The point is, Apple prides themselves in their names so it would be absurd to let the name “MacBook” go without revolutionizing it. And thus, it is very likely that Apple will preserve this name by introducing the “MacBook Touch” to take the Macbook name.